'Although only currently likely to prick the ears of online developers and Web site owners looking to assess compatibility levels....'
LOL.
Developers looking to assess compatibility levels should probably ask Adobe why a 64-bit Flash Player still isn't available, more than three years after the release of Windows XP x64, and over a year after Vista x64 hit the shelves.
At one time it was Linux support that fell short, but the Flash story gets worse and worse. Developers paying thousands of dollars for Adobe's Flash development tools must have been dropped on their heads at birth, given Adobe's half-hearted interest in making their tools cross platform compatible.
Telling users of 64-bit browsers to use 32-bit browsers instead is a laughable solution to the problem.
Pepe DeluxeMay 24th, 2008 - 21:05:34
'Although only currently likely to prick the ears of online developers and Web site owners looking to assess compatibility levels....'
LOL.
Developers looking to assess compatibility levels should probably ask Adobe why a 64-bit Flash Player still isn't available, more than three years after the release of Windows XP x64, and over a year after Vista x64 hit the shelves.
At one time it was Linux support that fell short, but the Flash story gets worse and worse. Developers paying thousands of dollars for Adobe's Flash development tools must have been dropped on their heads at birth, given Adobe's half-hearted interest in making their tools cross platform compatible.
Telling users of 64-bit browsers to use 32-bit browsers instead is a laughable solution to the problem.
Report this comment