Science

Twin towers mystery resolved, fire brought down WTC7

by Rich Bowden - Aug 21 2008, 23:45

Talkback

Add your comment (no registration required)

page: 1 

LesAug 22nd, 2008 - 04:51:22

As someone has said before, this latest report is just another bad example of science at the service of empire. Just fire alone huh? Well, should put some companies like Controlled Demolition, Inc. out of business. No need for their services when all you need to do to bring down a steel skyscraper is shut down the sprinkler supply and either leave the normal combustibles in place or plant a few of your own, then just set it on fire. Let it burn for a few hours and it should all fall neat and nice right into its own footprint. Oh, and did you know the word gullible isn't in the dictionary?

Report this comment

LarryAug 22nd, 2008 - 07:39:56

Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel

Report this comment

Orson OrwellAug 22nd, 2008 - 08:20:26

What a complete sham! No one believes this crap. There was molten steel in the basement for weeks afterwards! There is video of firemen moving people back saying the building is about to collapse and eyewitness who say they heard a countdown and then multiple explosions!

I think the government has really screwed themselves on this one. People just don't buy this crap. No one is stupid enough to believe that small fires were able to make a 47-story steel structure collapse at free-fall speed into its own footprint. It is completely ludicrous. A 'new phenomenon' my ass. This is really making the press and the government look like liars.

Report this comment

Chris W.Aug 22nd, 2008 - 12:25:03

This is BS... The explosion that took out the central supports was HUGE and it happened BEFORE the other towers collapsed. There were people inside when it happened.

This is unbelievable.

Report this comment

Sonia KermazAug 22nd, 2008 - 12:34:17

NIST BUDGET INCREASES REMAIN A MYSTERY!

How very interesting that the NIST Building 7 report follows a 22% budget increase for its 'operations.' Just before 9/11 the Bush administration pushed through a 300% increase in the FY 2002 NIST budget. Was this foresight or what?



Report this comment

Bob123Aug 22nd, 2008 - 16:24:50

'Fire triggered a 'new phenomenon''

YEAH RIGHT. They just expect us to believe anything now. So how many coincidences and 'first ever in history' can we have in one day? How many laws of physics will they violate in their desperate attempts to explain this crap to us??? WE'RE NOT BUYING IT.

-American Citizen

Report this comment

DonAug 24th, 2008 - 00:51:29

Anyone who watches the perfectly linear collapse of WTC7 and fails to see the deliberate hand of man, needs to spend more time in nature. Nature does not do things linearly. Nature is curvey. (An exception may be bees flying in a straight line back to the hive - but that's about it.

Report this comment

haters_implodingSep 11th, 2008 - 14:20:10

Be careful compiracy freaks. The fires of Bush hatred burn so hot in your puny little brains they are ready to implode vertically. I have two degrees in engineering. Vertical structural collapses happen all the time, both in nature and in man made structures, due to fires, earthquakes, etc... It is not common, but the structural design of the twin towers was not common either. But you don't want cold hard facts to cool the fires of your hatred. What pathetic losers you are and an embarrassment to the country!

Report this comment

page: 1 

Add your comment (no registration required)

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Advertising

Latest

Review: BlackBerry Storm from Verizon
Obama signals climate policy change in message to conference
First transplant of human windpipe conducted with stem cells
Symantec moving to Salem in 2009 after Thompson retires
Microsoft plans to drop OneCare in order to offer free security

Advertising