Science

Amateur astronomer captures lost NASA tool bag on video

by Stevie Smith - Nov 26 2008, 13:00

Talkback

Add your comment (no registration required)

page: 1 

Jim CliffeNov 26th, 2008 - 16:52:07

It's no surprise that Kevin Fetter made this remarkable observation. Most of the 'amateur' astronomers of today are working with tools and knowledge that would have placed them in the elite of the science a hundred years ago. As well, Canadians are (for some reason) especially good at astronomy.

Bravo! Wonderful accomplishment.

Report this comment

ScottNov 26th, 2008 - 17:06:38

How can the bag be a risk for the ISS or the space shuttle? The relative velocity of the bag is very similar in speed to both vehicles. There would be some danger to other satellites but anything in the same orbit has approximately the same velocity...

Report this comment

toolbag as projectileNov 26th, 2008 - 17:53:34

I would expect the density of the ISS to be less than that of the toolkit (not sure though) so the ISS should lose altitude faster than the toolkit. Then when the ISS raises its altitude back up again (as it does periodically) it needs to avoid this toolkit. The difference in speed could be as much as 1% or about 2000 mph.

Because everything larger than a few inches across is tracked this is just one more space debris item to avoid among tens of thousands.

Report this comment

GMLNov 26th, 2008 - 18:18:40

Is this tool bag in the same orbit as the shuttle and could it collide with the shuttle and damage it like a military projectile as that
fired from a tank ?. And how fast is it traveling ?.

Report this comment

Larry WheelsNov 27th, 2008 - 01:10:44

I have a tool kit at home that costs a lot less than 100,000. Maybe Nasa should buy their tools at
Wal-Mart and save some money. You can buy a little piece of string at a dollar store that could have worked to keep her tool kit from floating away.

Report this comment

fatdaddyNov 27th, 2008 - 03:48:59

Try using those Walmart tools in zero g while wearing a space suit ...

Report this comment

Björn GimleNov 27th, 2008 - 21:25:08

Density alone is not the important factor - it's the surface area (in travel direction) / mass.
An object of half the size, 'will' have 1/4 the surface area, but 1/8 of the mass, so it will decay twice as fast.

Report this comment

William KauterNov 28th, 2008 - 00:59:20

Before astronaut floates away, maybe NASA could use this toolbag to work on a recovery technique.

Report this comment

Pharm22Dec 19th, 2008 - 16:55:27

Very nice site!

Report this comment

page: 1 

Add your comment (no registration required)

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Latest

BitDefender: Trojans amounted for half of threats discovered in June
Q&A: Proginet CIO Kevin Bohan
iPhone 3GS sends AT&T registers into overdrive
Apple revises support document regarding hot 3GS handsets
SingTel confirms iPhone 3GS coming to Singapore

Latest Articles on Monsters&Critics

Myanmar junta snubs United Nations secretary-general
Two rebels, one soldier killed in Kashmir combat
British embassy staff to be released, says Iranian ambassador
At least nine policemen killed in Ingushetian violence
Croatian legislature to approve new government on Monday
Report: North Korea fires four more missiles (Roundup)
Philippine group embarks on ambitious sea voyage (Feature)
EU to lift ban Indonesia's Garuda, three other carriers
Emma Watson's 'desperate' co-star kiss
Confident Katherine Heigl